Photo by Tony Miller
Brett Fish, Citizens Against Sea-Tac Expansion chairman, makes a point to the Port of Seattle's Stanley Shepard as Water District 54 Commissioner Alli Larkin listens during last week's special Highline Forum meeting.

Port claims community perceptions on third runway were wrong

Complaints about overuse of the new third runway are based on community misperceptions, Sea-Tac International Airport director Mark Reis said Jan. 8 at a special Highline Forum meeting.

Reiss cited the runway's final Environmental Impact Statement, which said, "Its primary purpose would be to enable two separate arrival streams to Sea-Tac during poor and good weather, thus increasing the efficient operating capability of the Airport during peak periods."

But Des Mayor Bob Sheckler, Forum cochairman, said community leaders had been told repeatedly that the third runway would be used primarily for arrivals during bad weather.

"I believed it and now you are saying something different," Sheckler declared. "To be honest with you, that's what was said."

The Highline Forum was formed by officials from the Port of Seattle, the Highline School District and the cities of Burien, Normandy Park, Des Moines, SeaTac, Tukwila and Federal Way to discuss subjects of mutual interest. The Port operates the runway.

The special meeting to discuss community concerns about the new runway had been set for Dec. 18 but was postponed because of snow.

Responding to questioning from Sheckler, Reis said the new runway will be used as a "fully functioning runway."

Reiss also said the Port considers mitigation for the runway is complete, pending a Federal Aviation Administration noise impact study.

The process, known as a Part 150 study, will begin in November when the Port has enough data to determine noise impacts from the runway, according to Reis.

Based on the findings, more money may become available for more noise insulation for homes, Reis said.

However, the airfield will be used differently from April through October when the first runway will be closed for repaving. That will add to the challenge of assessing noise impact, he noted.

Sheckler said it could take three years before the Part 150 process is completed and five years before additional mitigation is done.

Reis said some changes could be made before the study is completed. But receiving funds from the FAA for insulating homes will have to wait until the study is completed.

Based on projections of third runway noise, the Port bought 64 homes and relocated residents in the north approach transition zone, sound insulated 87 homes in the north, and directionally sound insulated 27 homes.

While the Port operates the airport, the FAA actually manages air traffic and the use of the runway, Reis noted.

Outlining the FAA's runway plan, Reis reported the third runway will be utilized minimally from 10 p.m. to 6 a.m.

During normal conditions, the first runway will be the primary runway while during low visibility conditions both the first and third runways will be used with the second runway used primarily for departures.

During heavy traffic periods, the third runway will also be utilized, Reis noted.

Officials had estimated the third runway would handle 27.7 percent of the air traffic throughout the year, according to Reis.

"There was never any commitment that would be the number," Reis added. "That was a best guess."

Even during last week's rainy weather, third runway usage was only been in the 30 percent range, Reis noted.

"We've seen an evolution with traffic controllers on how they use the runaway," he said.

As part of it's third runway action plan, the Port will establish a communication working group with the FAA, post runway use and noise data on the Port's Web site, use portable monitors to obtain noise data and implement a community outreach plan.

Tukwila Mayor Jim Haggerton noted that with so much public outcry over recent runway use, "I can't imagine what will happen April 1" when the first runway is shut down.

Haggerton said Port officials had never mentioned to local leaders that the first runway would be closed before commissioners voted to repave it.

Reis responded that the repaving had been in the Port's capital development plan for ten years.

Noting that the third runway was projected to open in 2001 and then again in 2004, Reis said the other runways had been used more than anticipated.

The first runway is in such bad shape, it needs to be repaired soon, Reis added.

Reis also noted that the second runway could be repaved in 2010 as part of a federal stimulus project.

State Sen. Karen Keiser (D-33) said the third runway permits were granted on the basis that it would be used primarily during bad weather.

"I'm concerned what this does to the process," Keiser declared. "Why go through it, when it will change?"

Norm Pk wrote 1 year 32 weeks ago

Kim, in response to your

Kim, in response to your comment, in the early 70's when the Port expanded, they said that would be the last time they would grow. The residents took it to heart that even if the demand grew, that another airport would be build elsewhere to ease the demand. The Port of Seattle has not wanted to allow another airport to built and take away "their" revenue. In the mid-80's the Port demanded another airport. Then the surrounding Cities noticed that "their" revenue would now be impacted by the removal of homes and the desirability of people wanting to live near the airport. The only City surrounding the airport that doesn't have an issue with the Port is the City of Seatac but then again their revenue is supported by many businesses and not by residents. The airport has grown and now impacts more and more residents. The article is about how people were told one thing but feel deceived. Many may have continued to "fight" the 3rd runway if they had known how much more this runway would impact them and their homes.

Kim wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

People, you live by the

People, you live by the airport. In most cases, it was there first. If you didn't want to deal with airport noise, why did you choose to move so close to the airport to begin with?

Lisa wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

I like how the Port states

I like how the Port states that the Residents and others were wrong in our perception. Obviously, they lead us in that perception otherwise why would EVERYONE have the same issue??? Heck, even the State Sen. Keiser believed that the Third Runway was only going to be used during bad weather.

Lisa wrote 1 year 33 weeks ago

I live on the East side of

I live on the East side of the airport and have noticed that there seems to be more noise from the airport than in previous years. It's not only west-siders that are feeling/hearing the impact from the new runway. Hopefully, something can be done to mitigate the impacts, even at this late of a date....

Pat Nardo wrote 41 weeks 3 days ago

Airport Representatives Lied, Knowingly

Pat Nardo
As a former board member and vice president of the now defunct Des MOines Chamber of Commerce, I remember Bob Parker very well as the spokesman for the airport and for th effects of the third runway. Mayor Sheckler is absolutely correct in his and my understanding of how the runway was depicted by airport spokespersons, was to be used. It, the third runway, was to be used only for allowing incoming aircraft during inclement weather to use two paths, the main riunway and the third runway. We were told that the third runway would otherwise be used, in any case, for landings only. Now our home has lost value and I want the world to know that the airport representation was false, misleading, and intentional.

blvd_pk_girl wrote 39 weeks 6 days ago

3rd Runway No Big Deal IMO

I've lived by Sea-Tac from various angles since August 1978 (Boulevard Park, Federal Way). I was never opposed to a third runway and could never figure out why some were. Granted, I'm not a home owner. But as someone else said, the airport's been there for a long time, probably longer than most current residents living around it. People who moved here after Sea-Tac Airport was established don't really have anything to gripe about. I personally don't care. I'm still getting used to seeing airplanes land or take off from the third runway, however. The new flightpath appears to go over one of my former residences (either on 12th S or 8th S). I think it's kind of cool actually.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <b><a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <br><p>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Image Verification
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Follow us on Twitter and Facebook


Receive updates on news and events in the Highline area via Twitter or Facebook!